09-04-2006, 07:01 PM
I've heard so many anglers say that you need to skin ALL the fish you catch because if you don't, when you thaw the fish to cook, it will have a stronger flavor versus if you'd have skinned it.
I've also heard that if you skin the fish, you are taking away some of the fishes natural flavors. There were also more reason that you're suppose to leave the skin on, but I don't recall.
Me personally, i've always taken the skin off of fish, no matter what species it was. Catfish, mackeral (unless i'm steaking a large king or wahoo), flounder, trout, cobia, anything. I've always found that the skin does infact add a bit of a strong taste to the fish.
Anyone is disagreement? I'd like to know why. You might change this old salty dogs mind about skinning some fish.[cool]
[signature]
I've also heard that if you skin the fish, you are taking away some of the fishes natural flavors. There were also more reason that you're suppose to leave the skin on, but I don't recall.
Me personally, i've always taken the skin off of fish, no matter what species it was. Catfish, mackeral (unless i'm steaking a large king or wahoo), flounder, trout, cobia, anything. I've always found that the skin does infact add a bit of a strong taste to the fish.
Anyone is disagreement? I'd like to know why. You might change this old salty dogs mind about skinning some fish.[cool]
[signature]