08-11-2008, 05:38 PM
[cool][#0000ff]We have frequent discussions on this board about the various "perch factories" in Utah, and how they seem to be producing or not producing. I do a lot of perchin' my own self, and carry on some email and PM discussions with other "perch hounds" in Utah. I have developed some opinions and questions on both the current status of perch in several waters and on their future potential. With that in mind, I sent an email to Drew Cushing, Director of Warm Water Fisheries, with a copy to Richard Hepworth, one of the fisheries biologists.[/#0000ff]
[#0000ff][/#0000ff]
[#0000ff]"[#000000]Thought I would share some observations on perch fishing and ask some questions.
1. Is there going to be any kind of ongoing PROACTIVE management plan for perch fishing? I am referring to limits and regulations for specific waters.
A. Pineview. Perch limit is still 50, but the populations do not justify that. The perch fishery has dropped WAY OFF.
B. Jordanelle. Ditto
C. Starvation. Perch are an illegal introduction, and should be subject to no limit and mandatory kill. But, the limit is 20 perch, in spite of huge numbers.
2. The perch in Yuba appear to be headed for trouble. Angler observations are that the water level has dropped precipitously, leaving young perch vulnerable to all predators. And, pike and walleye are not the only predators. The carp in Yuba are at an obscene level. They are eating more baby perch and walleyes than the other predators. And it is difficult to even fish for perch or walleyes without carp taking the lures or baits. And, when these carp are gutted, they are full of fry. What's more, the average size of the perch has declined (lack of food...or fishing) and they are SKINNY. The perch are not able to compete with the carp for the available supply of young perch. Perch that are kept and filleted have thin fillets and little or no food in their stomachs.
3. The perch in Rockport and Echo seem to be doing well these days, with healthy populations of several year classes. Probably no need to make any regulation changes.
4. The perch in Mantua seem to have peaked and are being managed by bluegills and bass as well as anglers. Fewer large perch and those taken are skinnier.
I know the Division conducts netting surveys and angler creel census, but I am an avid perch jerker and maintain regular communication with several other knowledgeable guys around the state who also have an interest in the perch fisheries. My input is based upon REAL WORLD, weekly on-the-water experiences...tempered with just enough knowledge to be dangerous.
Not criticizing anybody. Just wanted to "download" and to see if there are any plans in the works to tweak any programs a little."[/#000000][/#0000ff]
[#0000ff][/#0000ff]
[#0000ff]Here was Drew's Response:[/#0000ff]
[#0000ff][/#0000ff]
[#0000ff]" [#000000]I agree with your assessments. We are working towards solutions but that will take some time. I think the solutions revolve around sampling in a manner that allows the UDWR to correctly model population responses to both natural and angling mortality. Once we get that done we can set limits that will have the correct population response.
Trust me we are making strides but they are small steps right now.
Drew[/#000000]"[/#0000ff]
[signature]
[#0000ff][/#0000ff]
[#0000ff]"[#000000]Thought I would share some observations on perch fishing and ask some questions.
1. Is there going to be any kind of ongoing PROACTIVE management plan for perch fishing? I am referring to limits and regulations for specific waters.
A. Pineview. Perch limit is still 50, but the populations do not justify that. The perch fishery has dropped WAY OFF.
B. Jordanelle. Ditto
C. Starvation. Perch are an illegal introduction, and should be subject to no limit and mandatory kill. But, the limit is 20 perch, in spite of huge numbers.
2. The perch in Yuba appear to be headed for trouble. Angler observations are that the water level has dropped precipitously, leaving young perch vulnerable to all predators. And, pike and walleye are not the only predators. The carp in Yuba are at an obscene level. They are eating more baby perch and walleyes than the other predators. And it is difficult to even fish for perch or walleyes without carp taking the lures or baits. And, when these carp are gutted, they are full of fry. What's more, the average size of the perch has declined (lack of food...or fishing) and they are SKINNY. The perch are not able to compete with the carp for the available supply of young perch. Perch that are kept and filleted have thin fillets and little or no food in their stomachs.
3. The perch in Rockport and Echo seem to be doing well these days, with healthy populations of several year classes. Probably no need to make any regulation changes.
4. The perch in Mantua seem to have peaked and are being managed by bluegills and bass as well as anglers. Fewer large perch and those taken are skinnier.
I know the Division conducts netting surveys and angler creel census, but I am an avid perch jerker and maintain regular communication with several other knowledgeable guys around the state who also have an interest in the perch fisheries. My input is based upon REAL WORLD, weekly on-the-water experiences...tempered with just enough knowledge to be dangerous.
Not criticizing anybody. Just wanted to "download" and to see if there are any plans in the works to tweak any programs a little."[/#000000][/#0000ff]
[#0000ff][/#0000ff]
[#0000ff]Here was Drew's Response:[/#0000ff]
[#0000ff][/#0000ff]
[#0000ff]" [#000000]I agree with your assessments. We are working towards solutions but that will take some time. I think the solutions revolve around sampling in a manner that allows the UDWR to correctly model population responses to both natural and angling mortality. Once we get that done we can set limits that will have the correct population response.
Trust me we are making strides but they are small steps right now.
Drew[/#000000]"[/#0000ff]
[signature]