03-20-2009, 04:06 PM
I'm sitting here watch VS. on a Friday morning here in the office pretending to be working.. And it struck me again that there seems to have been change in recent years from cutting the leader and letting the big fish swim away to going through some fairly risky moves to get the hook out before release..
I noticed this most recently during the shark fishing tournaments.. They went from quick catch and cut to getting double points for getting the hook out before releasing the shark..
I searched for some real studies on whether this is important or not to the survival rate of the fish and didn't find much and certainly nothing conclusive..
So what is the reason for the change in tactics?? Is it more of a public relations thing to make people "feel better" about not hurting the fish?? Or is there some real reason for the change??
I can only imagine that it is always better for the fish to get the hook out.. It's just common sense.. But is it really a 'big deal' when it comes to the fish??
Just curious for a decent debate on a Friday![[Image: happy.gif]](http://www.bigfishtackle.com/images/gforum/happy.gif)
[signature]
I noticed this most recently during the shark fishing tournaments.. They went from quick catch and cut to getting double points for getting the hook out before releasing the shark..
I searched for some real studies on whether this is important or not to the survival rate of the fish and didn't find much and certainly nothing conclusive..
So what is the reason for the change in tactics?? Is it more of a public relations thing to make people "feel better" about not hurting the fish?? Or is there some real reason for the change??
I can only imagine that it is always better for the fish to get the hook out.. It's just common sense.. But is it really a 'big deal' when it comes to the fish??
Just curious for a decent debate on a Friday
![[Image: happy.gif]](http://www.bigfishtackle.com/images/gforum/happy.gif)
[signature]