11-09-2011, 10:25 PM
Idahopanfish's question about Little Payette in another forum prompted me to do some thinking. Before it was over I think I blew a gasket! [
][fishin]
Here is the product of my thoughts. Not entirely sure I want to share this.... but what the heck. By my calculations, which could easily be wrong, I figured out the sqaure miles of several different lakes, then divided by the number of salmonids stocked in that lake for 2010.
Little Payette= 4347 salmonids per sqaure mile.
Cascade Lake=14,068 salmonids per square mile.
Magic = 36,666 salmonids per square mile.
I know these numbers don't account for natural production, but if was after a trout, where would I go? Depends on how much time I had, I guess, but in the SW corner of the state, Cascade is a hard lake to beat. And you can get a very nice mixed bag there too.
Makes me wonder what the area of SFCR is (I looked, but couldn't find it).
In case you are wondering, I did the math for Henry's too. 124,000 salmonids per square mile which breaks clear down to about 180 fish per acre! No wonder it is so awesome.
[signature]

Here is the product of my thoughts. Not entirely sure I want to share this.... but what the heck. By my calculations, which could easily be wrong, I figured out the sqaure miles of several different lakes, then divided by the number of salmonids stocked in that lake for 2010.
Little Payette= 4347 salmonids per sqaure mile.
Cascade Lake=14,068 salmonids per square mile.
Magic = 36,666 salmonids per square mile.
I know these numbers don't account for natural production, but if was after a trout, where would I go? Depends on how much time I had, I guess, but in the SW corner of the state, Cascade is a hard lake to beat. And you can get a very nice mixed bag there too.
Makes me wonder what the area of SFCR is (I looked, but couldn't find it).
In case you are wondering, I did the math for Henry's too. 124,000 salmonids per square mile which breaks clear down to about 180 fish per acre! No wonder it is so awesome.
[signature]