TubeDude, You have a pretty good handle on the Colorado River delta.
I grew up right on the border close to Yuma and still have property that I tend to down there.
I to spent alot of time down below the border camping, hunting and fishing as a kid and young man.. And my Dad did before that.
It is
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4ba2d/4ba2d4bfea47b9234a4dce5a3ab4fcf62ceba6c0" alt="Sad Sad"
that the Delta or any of the lower Colorado,or the Sea of Cortez can never be brought back to what it was. Not going to happen.
I could be wrong but I am afraid the surge called for in the article above will have no positive effect for the ecology of the Colorado river delta. That is gone for ever.
Mexico DOES store water in Lake Mead that they can use as they see fit. But that is not the water these people wanting to do the study would like to use.
As far as you seeing the Garden of Eden of the lower Colorado I am sure it must have seemed that way to you. But I don't think most people have no clue what the lower Colorado was like at one time. {Before my time as well.}
For hundreds of miles north of the Sea of Cortez the Colorado river bottom was a huge Cottonwood tree forrest many miles across in a lot of places.
Almost all of those trees were cut down by indians and sold as fire wood. Thousands and thousands of acres.
The people and economy of Utah had a big hand in all that chopping in a not so round about way.
As far as the delta itself. The final nail was put in that coffin when water from the Colorado river was completely cut off below the border for almost 7 years starting in 1931, to fill Lake Mead.
Plus the couple of years that a canal accident made the Colorado flow north for a couple of years around 1914,, I think . [Salton sea.]
I love the Colorado river and could go on and on about it and all sorts of western water issues.
You might like this history.
http://www.historynet.com/paddle-wheeler...n-1852.htm
[signature]