07-27-2006, 03:37 PM
[cool][#0000ff]No doubt about it. E-Lake could probably support "other" species...better than the cutts. But, don't you get caught filling your livewell with macks or tigers for your own personal "introductions". We get enough of that already. [/#0000ff]
[#0000ff][/#0000ff]
[#0000ff]I agree with one of your previous posts though. Seems like it shouldn't be too difficult to work out a "trade agreement" with Yellowstone...cutts for macks and vice versa. Of course that would involve some heavy thinking and some beaurocratic paperwork. That usually kills most of those deals.[/#0000ff]
[#0000ff][/#0000ff]
[#0000ff]My guess is that now that they have the leak fixed, E-Lake should "stabilize" a bit. After there are a couple of good seasons, with high water, we are likely to get a better idea of just what that lake is capable of. Still in transition right now. I'm willing to conduct my own research as often as possible.[/#0000ff]
[signature]
[#0000ff][/#0000ff]
[#0000ff]I agree with one of your previous posts though. Seems like it shouldn't be too difficult to work out a "trade agreement" with Yellowstone...cutts for macks and vice versa. Of course that would involve some heavy thinking and some beaurocratic paperwork. That usually kills most of those deals.[/#0000ff]
[#0000ff][/#0000ff]
[#0000ff]My guess is that now that they have the leak fixed, E-Lake should "stabilize" a bit. After there are a couple of good seasons, with high water, we are likely to get a better idea of just what that lake is capable of. Still in transition right now. I'm willing to conduct my own research as often as possible.[/#0000ff]
[signature]