10-02-2006, 11:13 PM
Interesting...I, as well as others probably, thought that those voicing concerns from RMA spoke for the organization. I am glad that RMA has decided not to take a side in this debate. I believe that anglers all too often believe that their volunteer service should be rewarded with added benefits...in this case, I believed RMA was trying use their work at Yuba as leverage to not open up the regs and allow for perch harvest. By priniciple, I believe that volunteering for such added benefits is wrong. I would hope that RMA is volunteering time and money without expecting something in return.
With that being said, I also believe that opening up the regulations is a good thing and still worth the fight. Take this proposal to the wildlife board...and keep up the fight.
[signature]
With that being said, I also believe that opening up the regulations is a good thing and still worth the fight. Take this proposal to the wildlife board...and keep up the fight.
[signature]