02-27-2009, 04:05 AM
Well, first of all, this ain't BS. I personally know these folks and if you call it BS you call me BS, which is of course your right.
Second, I have followed your postings, and for the most part respect your views and agree with your posts and views and have voiced my objections tor hb187 to my reps..
Third, the folks that I describe just don't want the hassel of calling the sheriff and waiting for an hour or more, trying to restrain em/record license plate #s if they are in a vehicle. or have the sheriff not show up at all. He's simply got more things on his plate running the ranch then to do it and in my opinion we shouldn't put this on them as much as it seems we are.
Personally what I plan to do when I run into them, which so far, has been very few (thankfully) is to lock the gate behind them and see what they do.
Last - I fish the public waters about 90% of the time and truly am very supportive to all the legal and responsible access we can get. But I am a little disappointed in your response. Hopefully, I miss interpreted it and if so I apologize. My point is we as responsible fishermen need to police ourselves so we don't abuse these rights and not put it totally on the land owners. There is nother side of the coin, so to speak.[
]
[signature]
Second, I have followed your postings, and for the most part respect your views and agree with your posts and views and have voiced my objections tor hb187 to my reps..
Third, the folks that I describe just don't want the hassel of calling the sheriff and waiting for an hour or more, trying to restrain em/record license plate #s if they are in a vehicle. or have the sheriff not show up at all. He's simply got more things on his plate running the ranch then to do it and in my opinion we shouldn't put this on them as much as it seems we are.
Personally what I plan to do when I run into them, which so far, has been very few (thankfully) is to lock the gate behind them and see what they do.
Last - I fish the public waters about 90% of the time and truly am very supportive to all the legal and responsible access we can get. But I am a little disappointed in your response. Hopefully, I miss interpreted it and if so I apologize. My point is we as responsible fishermen need to police ourselves so we don't abuse these rights and not put it totally on the land owners. There is nother side of the coin, so to speak.[
][signature]