Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Lowrance 520C
#8
Have you went to the Hummingbird 797 Jim?

NO! Nothing but Lowrance for me. I have a couple of the LCX-somethings now (25-C I think). They're a few years old. I haven't seen any improvements I gotta have yet. They're all pretty much the same, only the pictures and gadgets change.

Still have an X-85 too! Great unit, but a little hard on the eyes compared to the newer color screens. My newer color screens DO NOT show any more fish than the X-85, the older LMS-350's, or the ancient paper graphs did. Doesn't show the lure any better either. Like I said, only the picture and gadgets have changed. Sonar is still sonar.

AND THERE ISN'T 1/100TH OF A SECOND LESS "DELAY" IN A LIQUID CRYSTAL SONAR COMPARED TO A FLASHER!!!!!! When I hear people say that there is (The vexilar guys), it tells me they have no clue how to read a graph.

Piscuspersuit has a Humminbird and loves it.
[signature]
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Lowrance 520C - by jplacquay - 03-17-2009, 07:05 AM
Re: [jplacquay] Lowrance 520C - by Tracker_Guy - 03-17-2009, 07:16 PM
Re: [Tracker_Guy] Lowrance 520C - by Tarponjim - 03-18-2009, 02:51 AM
Re: [Tarponjim] Lowrance 520C - by fishinfool - 03-18-2009, 03:40 AM
Re: [fishinfool] Lowrance 520C - by Tarponjim - 03-18-2009, 03:55 AM
Re: [jplacquay] Lowrance 520C - by walleyebob - 03-18-2009, 12:16 AM
Re: [jplacquay] Lowrance 520C - by jplacquay - 03-18-2009, 03:43 AM
Re: [jplacquay] Lowrance 520C - by bigfishwanted - 03-18-2009, 03:52 AM
Re: [bigfishwanted] Lowrance 520C - by jplacquay - 03-18-2009, 04:05 AM
Re: [jplacquay] Lowrance 520C - by bigfishwanted - 03-18-2009, 04:17 AM
Re: [jplacquay] Lowrance 520C - by petty4life - 03-18-2009, 09:39 PM
Re: [jplacquay] Lowrance 520C - by MACMAN - 03-18-2009, 04:29 AM
Re: [jplacquay] Lowrance 520C - by lakextackle - 03-18-2009, 08:55 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)