Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
It has begun.
#9
I am really with you on #4 here. This is something I have been screaming about for years now, and usually when I get talking and thinking about it, I get so upset I could spit. . . flames.

I run the numbers every single year, and every single year anywhere from 22-32% of [#ff0000]IDAHO'S PIT tagged spring and summer chinook[/#ff0000] (I have the figures for each of the major ESU's) disappear between Bonneville and Lower Granite (mostly before McNary). So to me that is anywhere from 1/4 to 1/3 of the run.

Now here is the kicker: that is only for the fish [#ff0000]that made it to and crossed Bonneville![/#ff0000][#000000] We all know how badly they slaughter them below Bonneville, so I don't even want to know how many Idaho loses down there. Wonder what our LG #'s would look like if there wasn't a springer fishery on the Lower Columbia until all of Idaho's PIT tagged fish had moved out of that part of the system. . .[/#000000]

I stopped complaining about sea lions years ago. They aren't taking a drop in the bucket compared to Oregon and Washington anglers fishing on IDAHO chinook with OR and WA rules and regs.

Here is a nickels worth of advice: if you have a chance to watch the YouTube videos of Lower Columbia springer fishing. . . DON'T DO IT!!! Only a trip to the nuthouse will cure ya.
[signature]
Reply


Messages In This Thread
It has begun. - by chrome_junky - 03-26-2012, 04:10 AM
Re: [chrome_junky] It has begun. - by phutch30 - 03-26-2012, 05:51 PM
Re: [phutch30] It has begun. - by chrome_junky - 03-26-2012, 07:51 PM
Re: [chrome_junky] It has begun. - by phutch30 - 03-26-2012, 08:55 PM
Re: [phutch30] It has begun. - by Huntsman - 03-26-2012, 09:02 PM
Re: [Huntsman] It has begun. - by phutch30 - 03-26-2012, 09:39 PM
Re: [phutch30] It has begun. - by Got_Bait - 03-26-2012, 10:39 PM
Re: [Got_Bait] It has begun. - by ineedtofish - 03-26-2012, 11:38 PM
Re: [ineedtofish] It has begun. - by phutch30 - 03-27-2012, 03:11 PM
Re: [phutch30] It has begun. - by bytebull - 03-27-2012, 03:41 PM
Re: [phutch30] It has begun. - by Got_Bait - 03-27-2012, 05:02 PM
Re: [ineedtofish] It has begun. - by Got_Bait - 03-27-2012, 04:51 PM
Re: [Got_Bait] It has begun. - by B_RUN - 03-27-2012, 05:05 PM
Re: [Huntsman] It has begun. - by Got_Bait - 03-26-2012, 09:42 PM
Re: [Got_Bait] It has begun. - by phutch30 - 03-26-2012, 09:52 PM
Re: [phutch30] It has begun. - by chrome_junky - 03-27-2012, 03:55 PM
Re: [chrome_junky] It has begun. - by bytebull - 03-27-2012, 04:12 PM
Re: [phutch30] It has begun. - by LSR83 - 03-27-2012, 05:13 PM
Re: [LSR83] It has begun. - by phutch30 - 03-27-2012, 05:29 PM
Re: [phutch30] It has begun. - by LSR83 - 03-27-2012, 06:10 PM
Re: [phutch30] It has begun. - by B_RUN - 03-27-2012, 06:13 PM
Re: [B_RUN] It has begun. - by phutch30 - 03-27-2012, 06:29 PM
Re: - by chipmunksniper - 03-28-2012, 10:42 PM
Re: [chipmunksniper] - by STEELHEADKID - 03-29-2012, 02:47 AM
Re: [STEELHEADKID] - by chipmunksniper - 03-29-2012, 02:51 AM
Re: [chipmunksniper] - by phutch30 - 03-29-2012, 03:19 PM
Re: [chipmunksniper] - by chrome_junky - 03-29-2012, 04:44 PM
Re: [chrome_junky] - by phutch30 - 03-29-2012, 05:28 PM
Re: [phutch30] - by chrome_junky - 03-29-2012, 05:30 PM
Re: [chrome_junky] - by iwantabuggy - 03-29-2012, 07:44 PM
Re: [iwantabuggy] - by Got_Bait - 03-29-2012, 10:12 PM
Re: [Got_Bait] - by iwantabuggy - 03-30-2012, 02:28 PM
Re: [iwantabuggy] - by Got_Bait - 03-30-2012, 02:53 PM
Re: [Got_Bait] - by phutch30 - 03-30-2012, 03:15 PM
Re: [iwantabuggy] - by iliketofish - 03-30-2012, 03:25 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)