11-24-2012, 04:52 PM
I totally agree. Most of the law is clearly written, but that part leaves you with some question marks.
I think it's going to come down to whether this "family member" would be considered someone with "apparent authority to act for the owner". And I would say, maybe. But the guy told him that he "did not have permission to give permission".
[signature]
I think it's going to come down to whether this "family member" would be considered someone with "apparent authority to act for the owner". And I would say, maybe. But the guy told him that he "did not have permission to give permission".
[signature]