11-27-2012, 03:10 AM
Actually I would suggest that what the Court's opinion is on the subject is the law. The Court's duty is to say what the law is. Marbury v. Madison. The Utah Congress no doubt passed HB141 which today is the law on the books. However, in my opinion, it is in clear violation of the Conatser decision. The only way HB141 survives is if the Utah Courts overturn the Conatser decision.
I'm a lawyer and I will represent anybody who receives a trespass ticket while fishing in the river clearly on the stream bed. No charge. I have many other lawyer friends who will do the same. Also, as I stated previously, the work to have the Courts rule on the Constitutionality of HB141 is already in the process.
[signature]
I'm a lawyer and I will represent anybody who receives a trespass ticket while fishing in the river clearly on the stream bed. No charge. I have many other lawyer friends who will do the same. Also, as I stated previously, the work to have the Courts rule on the Constitutionality of HB141 is already in the process.
[signature]