Yay or Nay on HB141

[SatanLBZ801]

Hopefully there's still people reading this and getting involved by e-mails their reps and rules. Here's a little update.

FYI: Rally FRIDAY at 10:00am at the capital south stairs.

UTAH RALLY FOR PUBLIC WATER ACCESS

Salt Lake City, Utah - Utah Stream Access Coalition will be holding a Press Conference and Rally to fight the proposed House Bill68 and to support a new bill (yet to be numbered) sponsored be Rep. Dixon M. Pitcher to offer Compromise. We will be meeting at the Utah State Capital on Friday, February 15, 2013 10:00 AM.

HB68 was written by Rep. Kay L. McIff as an attempt to protect the HB141, also known as the "Public Waters Access Act" which slipped through the legislative process by McIff without time for public scrutiny. HB141 made public access to over 400 rivers and waterways closed off and susceptible to criminal trespass offense for the public to recreate in public waters that flow over private property, with the exception of floating as long as the bottom of the river is not touched.

Utah Stream Access Coalition (USAC) was created in 2010 in response to HB141. USAC is a grassroots organization with over 3,000 members and is currently challenging McIff's HB 141 in two separate court cases. "The goal of the Coalition has always been to restore the public's access to our rivers and streams. We believe our access is protected by the public trust doctrine, which the courts are currently evaluating. HB68 would restrict the courts from doing that," said Kris Olson, President of the Utah Stream Access Coalition.

Rep. Dixon M. Pitcher has proposed a compromise bill "Public Waters Access Act" that closely follows Idaho's law. It protects the private land owners while protecting the public right to access public water. "We believe Idaho law is instructive. Their law includes protections for access as well as for private property. It is a compromise that has been on the books and working for Idaho for over 35 years," Olson explained.

The Press Conference and Rally to oppose HB68 will be held on February 15, 2013 at 10:00 AM on the South Steps of the Utah State Capitol Building located at 350 North State Street in Salt Lake City. More information is available at utahstreamaccess.org

http://utahstreamaccess.org/usac-wp/category/usac/

Along with that, there's another bill that will be introduced tomorrow at the rally.

Bill: Reopen streams to public
Legislator wants to tweak 2010 law that lets property owners keep people out of riverbeds.
By Brian Maffly | The Salt Lake Tribune
First Published Feb 12 2013 08:22 pm • Last Updated Feb 13 2013 01:01 am
A Utah lawmaker is looking to Idaho’s stream-access laws to help resolve a long-simmering dispute over whether anglers, boaters and other recreational river users can stand or walk in riverbeds where the water flows over private land.

The unnumbered bill, expected to be introduced this week under the title "Public Waters Access Act," would enable limited public access to Utah streams over private lands, but only those capable of floating a 6-foot log at high water, according to sponsor Rep. Dixon Pitcher, R-Ogden.

"This protects private property rights, but it asks for access to existing public rights of way. It does not condone trespass," Pitcher said. "It doesn’t condone littering or property damage. It supports river cleanup and rehabilitation."

The measure would reel back in some of the public access lost in 2010 with the enactment of HB141, sponsored by Rep. Kay McIff, R-Richfield, which enabled property owners to bar anglers and other river users from walking on the stream beds crossing their property. The new bill replaces key provisions of HB141, according to attorney Craig Coburn, who helped adapt Idaho’s statute 36-1601 for Pitcher’s bill.

HB141 sparked the formation of the river-user group Utah Stream Access Coalition, which retained Coburn to sue in Heber City’s 4th District Court, which covers popular stretches of the trout-filled Provo River, in an attempt to invalidate that law.

Coburn said if Pitcher’s bill is passed and signed into law, his clients would dismiss their case, currently awaiting a judge’s ruling, and a related suit in Weber County.

The Idaho rule is based on the idea that navigable waterways are public transportation corridors that the members of the public have a right to use as long as they enter and exit where there is a public right of way.

"If it can’t float the log, it’s too small to be used and there is no conflict. I’m a great believer in property rights, but the water belongs to the public," Pitcher said. "It’s an excellent compromise that both parties can live with. Everybody doesn’t get exactly want they want but they get close to what they want."

His bill will be publicly unveiled Friday on the Capitol steps in conjunction with a stream-access rally that will also denounce McIff’s pending HB68, which would limit the reach of the public-trust doctrine.

"We believe our access is protected by the public-trust doctrine, which the courts are currently evaluating. HB68 would restrict the courts from doing that," said Utah Stream Access Coalition President Kris Olson, who called the Idaho model "instructive."

http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/558166...r.html.csp
[signature]