02-21-2013, 10:25 PM
Let's make sure we don't get ahead of ourselves claiming a conclusion to the Scofield question.
I think that's why some people think it is going to happen -- because those of the opinion it should or will be poisoned sometimes speak in terms too absolute for the situation.
There's a study ongoing and an open question.
Let's wait and see what the conclusion actually is.
Fair enough?
As for the impact on the trophy fish... Poisoning the lake absolutely will destroy Scofield as a trophy destination for several years to come unless the DWR has a nice batch of 25" trout to toss back in to get it going again.
That said, down the road the potential certainly could return -- in a 5 -10 years.
[signature]
I think that's why some people think it is going to happen -- because those of the opinion it should or will be poisoned sometimes speak in terms too absolute for the situation.
There's a study ongoing and an open question.
Let's wait and see what the conclusion actually is.
Fair enough?
As for the impact on the trophy fish... Poisoning the lake absolutely will destroy Scofield as a trophy destination for several years to come unless the DWR has a nice batch of 25" trout to toss back in to get it going again.
That said, down the road the potential certainly could return -- in a 5 -10 years.
[signature]