Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Flourocarbon vs nylon
#3
I fished with Orvis Guide of the Year Tim Linehan this year and asked him that very question. He uses fluro for tippet material on all rigs. He uses a blood knot and we never had one slip or break in four days. (We caught browns and rainbows to four pounds on 6X tippets and #20 nymphs.)

With dries, he believes that the fluoro - which sinks slightly - helps eliminate "leader shadow" that mono causes when it rides in the surface film. Fluoro doesn't sink enough to drown a dry fly in my experience, but it does sink just enough to do as described above.

I can tie a uni-uni knot easier and faster than I can tie a blood knot, so that's what I use. I've had them pull through when using three turns in the fluoro uni, but never with five. So I use five turns in both the mono and fluoro.
[signature]
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Flourocarbon vs nylon - by MBM1969 - 08-04-2013, 05:16 PM
Re: [MBM1969] Flourocarbon vs nylon - by RockyRaab - 08-04-2013, 10:17 PM
Re: [MBM1969] Flourocarbon vs nylon - by sinergy - 08-05-2013, 02:37 AM
Re: [MBM1969] Flourocarbon vs nylon - by sinergy - 08-05-2013, 03:30 AM
Re: [sinergy] Flourocarbon vs nylon - by GP - 08-06-2013, 08:15 PM
Re: [GP] Flourocarbon vs nylon - by sinergy - 08-06-2013, 11:59 PM
Re: [MBM1969] Flourocarbon vs nylon - by GP - 08-05-2013, 06:12 PM
Re: [GP] Flourocarbon vs nylon - by RockyRaab - 08-05-2013, 06:21 PM
Re: [GP] Flourocarbon vs nylon - by sinergy - 08-05-2013, 08:32 PM
Re: Flourocarbon vs nylon - by FlyRx - 08-06-2013, 03:02 AM
Re: [FlyRx] Flourocarbon vs nylon - by sinergy - 08-06-2013, 02:40 PM
Re: [GP] Flourocarbon vs nylon - by kandersonSLC - 08-05-2013, 09:19 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)