Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Flourocarbon vs nylon
#8
[font "Times New Roman"][size 3][/size][/font]
[size 3][font "Times New Roman"]Somewhere I heard an expert note that of all your gear, theonly two things a fish (might) see is your fly and tippet, so they should be ofthe highest quality. I agree that $20for flouro is madness, but when I think how much I spend in gas etc.just to get to stream or lake, spending a few bucks per trip for tippet thatmay make the difference between fun and frustration, I can at least rationalizeit to be a good investment.[/font][/size]
[font "Times New Roman"][size 3][/size][/font]
[font "Times New Roman"][size 3] [/size][/font]
[font "Times New Roman"][size 3][/size][/font]
[size 3][font "Times New Roman"]If you keep an eye out for sales of the stuff, you can getit for a more reasonable price.[/font][/size]
[font "Times New Roman"][size 3][/size][/font]
[signature]
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Flourocarbon vs nylon - by MBM1969 - 08-04-2013, 05:16 PM
Re: [MBM1969] Flourocarbon vs nylon - by sinergy - 08-05-2013, 02:37 AM
Re: [MBM1969] Flourocarbon vs nylon - by sinergy - 08-05-2013, 03:30 AM
Re: [sinergy] Flourocarbon vs nylon - by GP - 08-06-2013, 08:15 PM
Re: [GP] Flourocarbon vs nylon - by sinergy - 08-06-2013, 11:59 PM
Re: [MBM1969] Flourocarbon vs nylon - by kandersonSLC - 08-05-2013, 02:52 PM
Re: [MBM1969] Flourocarbon vs nylon - by GP - 08-05-2013, 06:12 PM
Re: [GP] Flourocarbon vs nylon - by RockyRaab - 08-05-2013, 06:21 PM
Re: [GP] Flourocarbon vs nylon - by sinergy - 08-05-2013, 08:32 PM
Re: Flourocarbon vs nylon - by FlyRx - 08-06-2013, 03:02 AM
Re: [FlyRx] Flourocarbon vs nylon - by sinergy - 08-06-2013, 02:40 PM
Re: [GP] Flourocarbon vs nylon - by kandersonSLC - 08-05-2013, 09:19 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)