06-27-2014, 06:03 PM
One way of looking at it. However that is a lot of man hours and dissapointment for a lot of kids that then builds animosity (even more than now) against IDFG for a case that could easily be argued that they were 
by the new law/regulation. Yes it was their fault they did not read it accurately, but at the same time this is a one time error that will correct itself since it will be fully in place for all future entries. As it sits now there are a lot of people that might have drawn before that may be a little irritated. But you start citing people and saying they can't use the tag that initially they were told they could, then you will have a lot of people that knew they did draw and now it's useless. Not a simple answer at this point, but which one is likely to draw the most heat against the dept? Probly not letting a bunch of kids have the opportunity to hunt.
[signature]
by the new law/regulation. Yes it was their fault they did not read it accurately, but at the same time this is a one time error that will correct itself since it will be fully in place for all future entries. As it sits now there are a lot of people that might have drawn before that may be a little irritated. But you start citing people and saying they can't use the tag that initially they were told they could, then you will have a lot of people that knew they did draw and now it's useless. Not a simple answer at this point, but which one is likely to draw the most heat against the dept? Probly not letting a bunch of kids have the opportunity to hunt.[signature]