Lakemaster vs. Navionics

[wolfs4evr]

I called Lakemaster like a year ago and whomever I talked to said they would pull a chip and loaded it on a unit and take some screenshots to email to me. That never happend. This made me call them again and do the wait times, etc today. Finally someone answered and said all the same stuff other than this time put me on hold and did all of that. They had no notes on what was defined as "partial". She got the unit fired up and looked around. To her it looked like a complete map/coverage. North to south and out to the east all looked like it was mapped (Mead). The only conclusion that I hinted at more than from her is that Mead/Mohave is bold in the lake list I posted above denoting HD coverage. A way more detailed version. I am betting, and the and the person on the phone somewhat agreed with my conclusion, that HD coverage is only partially done but there is a complete map. Thus the term partial coverage. She said all the coves/shorelines were very detailed but way out in the deep water it appeared to not be as detailed.

I might buy one to see... To be seen. The Navionics I have is 3 years old. I have been jones'in for a new map/chip, etc. If coverage is there from the Lakemaster and I like it I'd just drop my Navionics chip in my front 798 unit so I'd have a little more detail when I am on the bow verse the oem base map that comes in that unit.

The HUGE thing to me that I already mentioned above is the ability to adjust the map to the current water level. Navionics has zero features to do this. I have called/emailed them several times asking for something like that over the last several years. Everytime I get that isn't in the works type of dealio back from them.
[signature]