01-26-2015, 07:15 PM
Bottom line is SFW is probably the most controversial "conservation group" in Utah. I get it. They need their image to be better, so they advertise all the great things they do for the sportsmen of Utah. I also only counted one agency and one conservation group who were patted on the back.....DWR and all the great folks at SFW near and far. My question is how much of the "seed money" was already provided for by public resources that SFW is able to get and keep? It would be interesting to know. Also, the next time you get a chance to talk with the SFW peeps ask what their position was on the stream access bill that went through legislature in the past few years. BTW- I used to be a card carrying member of SFW.
[signature]
[signature]