I had never seen this before and it concerned me. When I pointed it out to the DWR, they didn't seem too concerned, moreover, I thought their attitude was rather cavalier.
As I stated earlier, I am not a perch fisherman, but I know their importance to the pike fishery. The biologists that I spoke to last week at Yuba seemed to think the lake is about to crash unless there is a high water year this coming spring allowing high enough water levels for a good perch spawn. No perch...no pike.
When I queried about why they don't plant some other prey specie, I was advised there was a problem with a down stream specie that was threatened, some kind of hump back sucker? It seems as though an introduction of some other specie of forage fish isn't possible because of the impact it might cause on the sucker.
So based on what I heard, the extraordinary pike fishery is about to suffer the same cyclic fate as the walleye, trout and trophy perch.
I know the DWR is concerned about it and trying to find an answer and that answer might be elusive. With Drew Cushings at the helm of the warm water fisheries there might be a chance. He seems to have a genuine concern and I think he might look outside of the box for a solution that is untraditional.
It is a complex problem, perhaps so much so that I'll never grasp it. All is know is that if the pike are lost it will be a
,
day for this fisherman.
Thanks for your feedback guys. I appreciate your insight. PezVela
[signature]