Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Bag limits,Possession, and answers.
#1
[font "Times New Roman"]I have answers for some questions from a previous thread. [/font]
[font "Times New Roman"] [/font]
[url "http://www.bigfishtackle.com/cgi-bin/gforum/gforum.cgi?post=549191;forum_view=forum_view_collapsed;page=unread#unread"][font "Times New Roman"][#800080]http://www.bigfishtackle.com/cgi-bin/gforum/gforum.cgi?post=549191;forum_view=forum_view_collapsed;page=unread#unread[/#800080][/font][/url]
[font "Times New Roman"] [/font]
[font "Times New Roman"]Here was the letter I sent to Gary Hompland from the Region 4 office. If anyone wants to talk to him his number is 208-324-4359 [/font]
[font "Times New Roman"] [/font]
[font "Times New Roman"] [/font]
Gary I am on a web page for fishing. A couple of things came up and the people there wanted clarification on them. There are some very good questions about the rules and we really need some clarification on them I will post below the main questions. If you want to add anything to the forum I will give you the info.
The web address for the thread is
[url "http://www.bigfishtackle.com/cgi-bin/gforum/gforum.cgi?do=post_view_flat;post=549191;page=1"][#800080]http://www.bigfishtackle.com/cgi-bin/gforum/gforum.cgi?do=post_view_flat;post=549191;page=1[/#800080][/url]
[font "Times New Roman"] [/font]
#1 if a person catches their daily bag limit of 6 trout. Can that person continue to fish for trout?
[font "Times New Roman"] [/font]
#2 Can that person continue to fish for a different species?
[font "Times New Roman"] [/font]
#3 the rules say
[font "Times New Roman"] [/font]
(POSSESSION LIMIT: Maximum number of fish that may be lawfully in possession of any person. “Possession limit” shall apply to fish while in the field or being transported to the final place of consumption or storage. )
Here is the question.
If the daily bag limit for lets say Magic Res is 6 trout your bag and Possession limit is 6 trout total that you can have on you, or in your vehicle even if you have been fishing for 2 or 10 days am I right?
[font "Times New Roman"] [/font]
#4 The next Question is about where does the Possession limit end.
If you go out fishing and you catch 6 trout. You take them home and can them or freeze them can you go fishing the next day and bring home another 6 fish limit and put them in your freezer or can them? How many daily bag limits can you have in your freezer or canned?
[font "Times New Roman"] [/font]
#5 Does the Idaho Fish and Game need a search warrant to go from your front door to possible places in your home that could store fish. to check for illegal fish?
[font "Times New Roman"] [/font]
#6 Is this sentence true or false?
Idaho Fish and Game does not need a search warrant to go from your front door to possible places that could store fish. You wave that right when you buy a fishing license .
[font "Times New Roman"] [/font]
Thanks Gary we just need some info on the rules. Ron

Gary answered some of the questions and then he emailed Boise for clarification on the others.

Ron, the answers to questions 1 & 2 are yes. Unless specifically prohibited you can continue to fish. Henry’s Lake is one place where continuing to fish once your limit is attained is prohibited. You could also fish for other species.

Q3. I’m trying to find out if the rules for possession limits has changed. The wording in the brochure has changed but I don’t know if the intent was to allow possession of more than a possession limit in camps. Possession limits used to only apply while in transit, with the exception of waterfowl rules (due to federal rules about waterfowl possession rules). Once your fish possession limit is transported to your permanent residence, possession rules used to cease. Possession could also be reduced by giving fish away via a proxy statement, eating them, or sending them to your residence or another person by common carrier (UPS, US mail, bus, etc).

Q5 & 6. A person’s residence has several protections against abusive use of legal power as spelled out in the 4th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution (Against unreasonable searches and seizures). Anytime a law enfor officer wants to search for contraband or evidence of a crime at a residence they can either ask the resident for consent to search or seek a search warrant. A search warrant is a court order obtained through development of probable cause (information and evidence) presented before a magistrate. If the probable cause meets legal standards the magistrate will issue a search warrant ordering officers to search of constitutionally protected areas and seizure of evidence and contraband so the state’s case for prosecution can be continued. The requirements for probable cause extend to what is call the “curtilage.” The curtilage is essentially the main areas of a persons living quarters such as the house, garage, sheds, etc but would not include surrounding fields, streams, etc.

Idaho Code relaxes slightly the legal standard for conservation officers to search items like campers, tents, trailers, boats, storage facilities, etc that are subject to alteration, movement, or easy disposal and destruction of evidence or contraband. Idaho law has modified this aspect of searching for contraband and evidence in these easily moveable or disposable situations because of what is called “exigent circumstances.” The legal standard of probable cause is still required for the warrant-less search but the process to secure a search warrant is waved.

SO: The answer to searching for unlawful evidence at a residence; we have to present evidence before a magistrate to obtain a search warrant before we can enter constitutionally protected areas such as a residence. However; we are regularly given consent to search by subjects; especially if they are aware we have probable cause and could obtain a search warrant. Within a camp, boat, etc if we have probable cause that a violation has occurred and the evidence of the violation is in a camper we can go after it without a warrant.

Most prosecutors would prefer we secure a search warrant in all cases however, they also understand time is often of the essence and to prevent destruction of evidence we sometimes search areas not constitutionally protected without warrant when we have probable cause.

As I find out more on possession limits I’ll let you know.

Thanks g
[font "Times New Roman"] [/font]
[font "Times New Roman"]Here is the second letter from him on the rest of the questions.[/font]
[font "Times New Roman"][/font]
Ron, the possession limit definition has not been changed. The fish possession limits apply while in the field or during transportation to the final place of consumption or storage. The fish possession limits apply to anglers while away from their permanent residence or domicile.

There are several ways to reduce the number of fish in possession while away from your residence: eat some, give some away through the use of a proxy statement, send some home with another person through the use of a proxy statement, or send them home by commercial carrier.

The bottom line- fish possession limits apply to multi-day campers, but do not apply at a permanent residence.

Thanks g
[font "Times New Roman"] _________________________________________________[/font]
[font "Times New Roman"][/font]
[font "Times New Roman"]here are the answers to the questions. Ron[/font]
[font "Times New Roman"] [/font]
[font "Times New Roman"] [/font]
[signature]
Reply
#2
Idahoron,

Thanks for going to all the extra effort to clarify many point of fishing discussion.

OvidCreek
[signature]
Reply
#3
So are you saying, a person can go out and catch their limit (let's say 6) then either send them home with or take them home, put them in the freezer and go back and do it again? Keep doing it all day?
[signature]
Reply
#4
The daily bag limit would apply. One limit daily.

I was actually right on the original thread. I'm so proud.
[signature]
Reply
#5
Okay, so lets say Henry's...you can go catch your two, take them home and through them in the freezer, then go back the next day and so on?
[signature]
Reply
#6
Yes. You catch your two fish, take them home give them to the neighbor, can them, freeze them eat them, what ever. The next day you are good to go, and the next and the next. Possession ends at the front door of the house. Ron
[signature]
Reply
#7
Holy cow...I am betting this just opened a whole new can of worms, because I am betting 99% didn't realize this.
Should be interesting to see how this plays out over the years to come.
[signature]
Reply
#8
I've always read the law that way. It's nice to know I wasn't illegal.
[signature]
Reply
#9
From the sounds of it, it is real hard to be ILLEGAL...LOL
Anything goes in Idaho....[Wink]
[signature]
Reply
#10
Thanks for clearing that up. That was a well written letter and response. In Florida similar rules apply and it has never been a problem in spite of the presence of way more fishermen (and women).
[signature]
Reply
#11
Thanks for the post. It is nice to see things explained more clear. I could have tried to explain this for days and gotten no where(I kinda did in the other post), but this should help people understand things better, especially coming from someone who is in the know.
[signature]
Reply
#12
Gary has been a friend of mine for years. If anyone has any questions I am sure he will be glad to help. Like he did on this subject if he can't answer it he will get the answer form Boise to make sure there has not been any changes to any rules. Ron
[signature]
Reply
#13
it goes to show its not as clear as it might seem, infact it seems very confusing reading the regs then that. ask him if there are any plans to change to a 365 day license rather than the calander year
[signature]
Reply
#14
Glad to get to the bottom of this. I don't like to keep a ton of fish never more than I can eat, but I am eyeing a new smoker and it would hold several limits of Kokanee at a time. So now I can freeze up enough fish to fill the smoker, if I get my smoker anybody can stop by my shelter (blue comand post) and get a taste.
[signature]
Reply
#15
Sorry for hijacking the thread, but how are they going to tell your blue command post from mine?[Wink]

Windriver
[signature]
Reply
#16
Easy, his will be the one smoking!!!! and yours the one with the dining room table and the waiter....LOL
[signature]
Reply
#17
That is great....No waiter but fresh rainbow was on the grill in the command post at Chesterfield yesterday. It really was some of the best trout I have ever had.

I will have to go by Maghunters "smoking" command post for a sample.[cool]

Windriver
[signature]
Reply
#18
Thanks for looking into these questions. I too think that some areas in the regs are certainly in gray areas, or at least explained that way. I also agree that a lot of the interpretation can tremendously depend on the officer writing out the ticket and what kind of a day he is having. I can see though, having a good morning at Henry's and taking two brookies to the ice cooler, then hitting Island Park on the way home would allow an opportunity of harvesting four more fish to fill the limit. However though, would it apply in reverse? Or once the Henry's Lake limit is reached, does that count as a bag limit and preclude further fishing in different waters? Hmmmm . . . .
[signature]
Reply
#19
I can't believe people eat THAT MUCH TROUT.[angelic]
Sea food yes, trout....mercury....not so much[laugh]
[signature]
Reply
#20
Wow! Thanks for the great info. That really clears things up. I always try to err on the side of caution but this really opens it up pretty wide!

Thanks again Ron!

Don
[signature]
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)