Posts: 234
Threads: 0
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation:
0
Before the Crooked, the Deschutes, or the John Day were damed, they were all poorly producing rivers as the summer temps were too high. You follow the river long enough down past the dam, they are really poor salmonoid rivers - because they become to warm so fast in the summer.
I found the video very disingenuous to claim that for "thousands of years the Deschutes river ran cold . . ." Hogwash. For thousands of years it ran cold in the winter. Since dams were built, it ran colder than natural all through the summer, and had much more consistent temps to have year-round salmonids.
I also find it disingenuous to omit the reasons the project was put in place - specifically to restore warmer temps to restore native fish. Kinda a big fact to be glossing over.
Man changed that river from it's natural state it had been in "for thousands of years". Apparently someone thought it important to put natives above rainbows, and change it back towards how it was before we put dams in. I don't like it, but tell the real story, not some tear jerker that is factually incorrect and omits key facts.
[signature]
Posts: 234
Threads: 0
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation:
0
It's been thirty some years since I've visited and fished the john day. I do recall finding some great smallmouth fishing. And some pretty decent trout fishing below a dam. Good enough that Dad took me there for quite a few trips. That trout stretch was completely applicable to the Deschutes' situation.
BOTH rivers were worthless as salmonoid streams (salmonoid is not synonymous with anadromous - salmonoid includes rainbow trout) due to summer temps. That is the way the deschutes naturally is, no matter how stable the metolious temps, or how high the water came from. It's a central Oregon river fed by streams that warm up every summer. Its better than john day or crooked due to size, but all those feeder rivers of the deschutes (aside from the metoilous) were way to warm before confluence to hold good trout populations. When's the last time you targeted the lower stretches of the crooked before the lake (except perhaps during spawn - if that's allowed any longer)? Or deschutes after Bend?
The crooked was my goto destination for a decade or so when it was better off than it is now. That stretch below pineview dam would be as worthless as the lower stretches as a year-round trout stream if it were not for the stable temps (and summer flows) of the damn. But that stretch is NOT natural.
The Deschutes of the last several decades is NOT natural. It's NOT how it flowed for thousands of years. Period. And that is the crux of why the changes have been made recently to increase the temps of the lower sections. I personally disagree that natives in that stretch are more important or worthwhile than a thriving rainbow fishery. But that is moot.
The video is well put together, but it's crap. Spin job at best. It's people complaining that their way of living or recreation is changing. I'd be pissed to. But I'd at least try to be honest about it.
[signature]