lunkerhunter2 wrote:[/quote]
Typical mentality for a bass hugger. . You can catch bass anywhere...but thousands of people from around the WORLD come to UT and especially pineview to catch tigers. Now which one is bringing in more money??[
][/quote]
Agreed to a point. We are avid anglers for Tiger Muskies and have C&R some real monsters other anglers would've easily kept.
We're very excited about the Lee Kay hatchery as it will be nice that the state of Utah has it's own resource for TM stocking.
Utah isn't the land of 10,000 lakes (maybe 10,000 trickle streams to wade in). Only PV gives an avid Musky angler a potential trophy catch. So I personally hope "
[/b]thousands[/b]"
[/b]of anglers "don't come[/b]" to PV to fish for TMs. I don't care about the $$$ they'd bring but instead the fish'n resource they'd potentially disseminate. Not worth it...come and Ski and play in Utah's winter wonderland that's what Utah is really known for anyway.
Face it, PV when at capacity is only close to 2900 surface acres with maybe 9 miles of shoreline. Compare that with MN, WI, Canada waters with thousands of surface acres and miles-upon-miles of shorelines.
With Newton and the other bodies of water having TMs it will be several years before anything of brag'n rights comes out. And I'm talk'n a 45 plus inch fish.
So IMHO I wouldn't want every TD&H flying out to Utah solely fish'n PV. Fish WI, MN, Canada. Call me selfish...but face it we don't have grundles of waterways, thousands of surface acres and miles of shorelines with TMs.
I just hope the DWR keeps PV closed to keeping TMs for a few more years. Based on the year groups we've caught these year group fish are very healthy and helping with controlling the pan fish populations.
Utah has plenty of waters including PV holding Bass. Also this is dominate Trout state and I for one enjoy fishing for a fish at the "top" of the "inland fish food chain" where all other fish are just bait IMHO. [
][
]
[signature]