03-19-2009, 12:00 PM
I found this article in the march 16th Tribune talking about HB 187. Rep. Ferry is quoted as
Rep. Ben Ferry, R-Corinne, unsuccessfully attempted to restrict public access to streams on private property that historically have been off-limits. His measure followed a Utah Supreme Court ruling that declared all streambeds publicly accessible.
"The ruling opened up access to places where nobody has ever been before without permission," Ferry said. "What [the ruling] did was violate all historical private-property rights. There are very few people who don't think the Supreme Court went too far."
But hundreds of anglers fired off e-mails and trekked to the Capitol to fight for access. Their voice, Ferry said, drowned out those of private-property owners with streams running through their land.
"The sleeping giant has awoken, and there's going to be unintended consequences," Ferry warned. "Personal-property rights were seriously infringed on in that ruling."
I wonder what he meant by "unintended consequences," ? Here is a link to the story.
[url "http://www.sltrib.com/ci_11927901?IADID=Search-www.sltrib.com-www.sltrib.com"]http://www.sltrib.com/...b.com-www.sltrib.com[/url]
[signature]
Rep. Ben Ferry, R-Corinne, unsuccessfully attempted to restrict public access to streams on private property that historically have been off-limits. His measure followed a Utah Supreme Court ruling that declared all streambeds publicly accessible.
"The ruling opened up access to places where nobody has ever been before without permission," Ferry said. "What [the ruling] did was violate all historical private-property rights. There are very few people who don't think the Supreme Court went too far."
But hundreds of anglers fired off e-mails and trekked to the Capitol to fight for access. Their voice, Ferry said, drowned out those of private-property owners with streams running through their land.
"The sleeping giant has awoken, and there's going to be unintended consequences," Ferry warned. "Personal-property rights were seriously infringed on in that ruling."
I wonder what he meant by "unintended consequences," ? Here is a link to the story.
[url "http://www.sltrib.com/ci_11927901?IADID=Search-www.sltrib.com-www.sltrib.com"]http://www.sltrib.com/...b.com-www.sltrib.com[/url]
[signature]