07-03-2010, 05:15 AM
[font "Helvetica-Bold"][size 1][font "Helvetica-Bold"][size 1]
[left]BAG LIMIT: [/size][/font][/size][/font][font "Helvetica"][size 1][font "Helvetica"][size 1]The maximum number of fish that may be lawfully
[left]harvested by any one person in one day. [#ff0000]The term “bag limit”[/#ff0000]
[/size][/font][/size][/font][font "Helvetica"][size 1][font "Helvetica"][size 1]
[left][#ff0000]shall be construed to be an individual, independent effort and[/#ff0000]
[left][#ff0000]shall not be interpreted in any manner as to allow an individual[/#ff0000]
[/size][/font][/size][/font][font "Helvetica"][size 1][font "Helvetica"][size 1]
[left][#ff0000]to take more fish than their “bag limit” and including them in[/#ff0000]
[left][#ff0000]filling the “bag limit” of another.[/#ff0000] The bag and possession limits
[/size][/font][/size][/font][font "Helvetica"][size 1][font "Helvetica"][size 1]
[left]are equal, except where listed in region exceptions and for
salmon and steelhead.
I don't know how the F&G would view this other than to show what the defenition says...
I wouldn't push the issue since this type of activity would be an attempt to "allow an individual to take more fish than their bag limit." It would also be "including them in filling the "bag limit of another."
Just my take on it.
Windriver
[/size][/font][/size][/font]
[signature]
[left]BAG LIMIT: [/size][/font][/size][/font][font "Helvetica"][size 1][font "Helvetica"][size 1]The maximum number of fish that may be lawfully
[left]harvested by any one person in one day. [#ff0000]The term “bag limit”[/#ff0000]
[/size][/font][/size][/font][font "Helvetica"][size 1][font "Helvetica"][size 1]
[left][#ff0000]shall be construed to be an individual, independent effort and[/#ff0000]
[left][#ff0000]shall not be interpreted in any manner as to allow an individual[/#ff0000]
[/size][/font][/size][/font][font "Helvetica"][size 1][font "Helvetica"][size 1]
[left][#ff0000]to take more fish than their “bag limit” and including them in[/#ff0000]
[left][#ff0000]filling the “bag limit” of another.[/#ff0000] The bag and possession limits
[/size][/font][/size][/font][font "Helvetica"][size 1][font "Helvetica"][size 1]
[left]are equal, except where listed in region exceptions and for
salmon and steelhead.
I don't know how the F&G would view this other than to show what the defenition says...
I wouldn't push the issue since this type of activity would be an attempt to "allow an individual to take more fish than their bag limit." It would also be "including them in filling the "bag limit of another."
Just my take on it.
Windriver
[/size][/font][/size][/font]
[signature]