08-19-2007, 01:40 PM
I like Edwards,
I like his social reform ideas, wich include the same ideals that Romney has... They both have the mow our own lawn before mowing someone elses mentality. Mostly because if we cant take care of our selves we cant help any one else any where around the globe.
Because of the first welfare refrom by regan and bush and the failure of the clinton administration to reform the reformed health care porton of the welfare act I had a nephew die at the age of 18, Just two weeks after he inlisted in the army to fight in araq from apendisidous. He was turned away at the hospitol when they found he had no insurance. He was told he had the flue and would be ok in a couple days. needless to say in a couple days his apendix ruptured sending poisen though his entire system, and he died on the third day from a slow excrutiating pain and feaver.....
it is almost 4 years to the day right now.... Today might even be the anivercery of his death I would have to check. It was in the middle of august.
My point is that there is no reason that americans in cases of emergencies that they cant get medical attention. I know there is a law that says a hospitol cant turn some one away in such cases... well they do becuse these people dont have money to sew for malpratice. If they had the money to sew for malpratice they would have had the money for a hospitol visit or insurance...
so when you ask what the issues are. they should be in this order.
[ol] [li]health and welfare of all citisens[/li] [li]economics earnings and savings of all citisens[/li] [li]housing for all citisens[/li] [li]education for all citisens[/li] [li]fair traiding agrements, taxing all incoming products to make it equal not greater than what it cost to make it here.[/li] [li]failing internal infrastructures[/li][/ol]
all of the above should be delt with before long any one gets a tax break, none of the above should be sacrificed for the sake of any one getting a tax break. It is imoral to do so....
things that should not be an issue in a presidential ellection is. [ol] [li]ristricting gun rights[/li] [li]abortion[/li][/ol]
These are individual rights and criminal law issues and not the responcibility of the highest business executive of the land.
those dead horses have been argued for 30+ years, If you chage either one people are going to be screaming mad...
any one attempting to make these an issue is some one who is doging and clouding the true issues.
[signature]
I like his social reform ideas, wich include the same ideals that Romney has... They both have the mow our own lawn before mowing someone elses mentality. Mostly because if we cant take care of our selves we cant help any one else any where around the globe.
Because of the first welfare refrom by regan and bush and the failure of the clinton administration to reform the reformed health care porton of the welfare act I had a nephew die at the age of 18, Just two weeks after he inlisted in the army to fight in araq from apendisidous. He was turned away at the hospitol when they found he had no insurance. He was told he had the flue and would be ok in a couple days. needless to say in a couple days his apendix ruptured sending poisen though his entire system, and he died on the third day from a slow excrutiating pain and feaver.....
it is almost 4 years to the day right now.... Today might even be the anivercery of his death I would have to check. It was in the middle of august.
My point is that there is no reason that americans in cases of emergencies that they cant get medical attention. I know there is a law that says a hospitol cant turn some one away in such cases... well they do becuse these people dont have money to sew for malpratice. If they had the money to sew for malpratice they would have had the money for a hospitol visit or insurance...
so when you ask what the issues are. they should be in this order.
[ol] [li]health and welfare of all citisens[/li] [li]economics earnings and savings of all citisens[/li] [li]housing for all citisens[/li] [li]education for all citisens[/li] [li]fair traiding agrements, taxing all incoming products to make it equal not greater than what it cost to make it here.[/li] [li]failing internal infrastructures[/li][/ol]
all of the above should be delt with before long any one gets a tax break, none of the above should be sacrificed for the sake of any one getting a tax break. It is imoral to do so....
things that should not be an issue in a presidential ellection is. [ol] [li]ristricting gun rights[/li] [li]abortion[/li][/ol]
These are individual rights and criminal law issues and not the responcibility of the highest business executive of the land.
those dead horses have been argued for 30+ years, If you chage either one people are going to be screaming mad...
any one attempting to make these an issue is some one who is doging and clouding the true issues.
[signature]