Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Eagle Cuda 242
#5
[cool][#0000ff]I have used Cudas for several years, and had largely found them to be "OKAY" for the money. They had good bottom definition and temperature readings, but produced a lot of false signals for fish. Depending upon what you are fishing for, and at what depth, that can be a problem.[/#0000ff]
[#0000ff][/#0000ff]
[#0000ff]I have been basically happy with the Cuda 168EX that I have used the last two years. It has put me on a lot of fish and performed fairly well. I recently upgraded to the Humminbird 565, on a special deal, and I am glad I did. It has been well worth the money.[/#0000ff]
[#0000ff][/#0000ff]
[#0000ff]I still have the Cuda 168EX but will no longer be using it. If you want to buy it for $50, I will help you install it on your tube. It is all set up but you need to add a couple of things on your tube to attach the transducer.[/#0000ff]
[#0000ff][/#0000ff]
[#0000ff]Shoot me a PM if you are interested and we can go from there.[/#0000ff]
[signature]
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Eagle Cuda 242 - by Lingwall - 08-03-2009, 06:28 PM
Re: [Lingwall] Eagle Cuda 242 - by idahoron - 08-03-2009, 11:26 PM
Re: [Lingwall] Eagle Cuda 242 - by BigBo - 08-04-2009, 02:20 AM
Re: [BigBo] Eagle Cuda 242 - by flygoddess - 08-04-2009, 04:02 AM
Re: [flygoddess] Eagle Cuda 242 - by BigBo - 08-06-2009, 06:56 PM
Re: [Lingwall] Eagle Cuda 242 - by TubeDude - 08-04-2009, 11:25 AM
Re: [TubeDude] Eagle Cuda 242 - by Illinoisgiller - 08-04-2009, 12:34 PM
Re: [TubeDude] Eagle Cuda 242 - by Lingwall - 08-04-2009, 02:53 PM
Re: [Lingwall] Eagle Cuda 242 - by flygoddess - 08-04-2009, 05:52 PM
Re: [flygoddess] Eagle Cuda 242 - by Lingwall - 08-04-2009, 05:54 PM
Re: [Lingwall] Eagle Cuda 242 - by rw02kr43 - 08-04-2009, 09:10 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)