04-18-2013, 07:02 PM
In all seriousness, if they enhance and/or develop a small spring creek for clients to fish on or fishing ponds, they certainly will keep the public off if it. And that is as it should be. However, their touting of the "18 inch fish" in the "Blue ribbon" Provo river would indicate that they are using the Upper as a draw as well. That is where their aims could collide with the stream access battle. If their ability to woo high rollers is dependent on exclusive Provo river access, they may have some issues if HB141 is shot down. .
As it is right now, the Provo river area in question is currently off limits to the public, so the sale of the land does not mean "more" fishable river was "lost".
[signature]
As it is right now, the Provo river area in question is currently off limits to the public, so the sale of the land does not mean "more" fishable river was "lost".
[signature]