02-05-2014, 04:13 PM
Very true, I can definitely see where you are coming from. As I said, I usually don't use it. The turd argument however, is an invalid one. The ratio of the volume of a turd compared to the volume of a pool would be like a swimming pool full of WD 40 being dumped into a reservoir the size of starvation. Of course that would be bad!
In 13 years I've used less than one quarter of a small pocket sized container of WD 40, so while I'm not an advocate of WD 40 as attractant due to the fact that 9 times out of 10 it's more harm than good as far as the bite goes. [crazy]
Fun fact: One ammonia and water based pee on the ice at any given lake has FAR worse effects on aquatic life not to mention a higher volume to make a more noticeable difference. If you really want to make a difference let's figure out how to stop all those evil ice and lake pissers.[
]
[signature]
In 13 years I've used less than one quarter of a small pocket sized container of WD 40, so while I'm not an advocate of WD 40 as attractant due to the fact that 9 times out of 10 it's more harm than good as far as the bite goes. [crazy]
Fun fact: One ammonia and water based pee on the ice at any given lake has FAR worse effects on aquatic life not to mention a higher volume to make a more noticeable difference. If you really want to make a difference let's figure out how to stop all those evil ice and lake pissers.[
][signature]